ENTRY POINTUnder review

FA200SEB

User Function FA200SEB()

Allows differentiated analysis of bank return occurrences.

FA200SEBFINA200

01 · OVERVIEW

Overview

The specific page describes occurrence analysis but its parameter/return tables are empty. P12.2210 records lProcessa := ExecBlock in FA200GER without a fourth argument. This shows a caller decision but does not detail each value’s consequences or available SEB fields. No useful GitHub implementation was found. (Refs. 1–2)

02 · SYNTAX

Syntax

User Function FA200SEB()

Parameters

Entry point context

UnconfirmedContext to confirm

The complete technical contract remains unconfirmed. Do not assume types, PARAMIXB positions or aliases beyond the evidence described.

Return value

Assigned to lProcessa; complete processing policy unconfirmed in the evidence.

03 · PRACTICAL EXAMPLE

Observed call and context

// P12.2210 caller excerpt (EURAI, ref. 2); not an entry point implementation.
// FINA200.PRX - FA200GER() -> LPROCESSA := EXECBLOCK("FA200SEB",.F.,.F.)

Expected result

The record shows arguments and immediate return use where present. It omits the full caller body and does not establish commit timing.

BEST PRACTICES

Do not use Return .T. as a neutral baseline without inspecting the processing branch. Distinguish bank code, internal occurrence and financial action in testing.
A call without a fourth argument does not document a PARAMIXB layout. Preserve caller identifiers and do not invent fields or positions.
Test plan: compare standard and customized flows, exercise success, rejection and repetition, and inspect balances, movements and accounting as applicable.
Under review: example not compiled or run in Protheus. Verify aliases, locks, transaction position and compatibility in the target release and patch.